[WIN] Non-Hardware Specific Imaging Tool
#1
Posted 25 August 2006 - 03:27 PM
Thanks
Jason
#2
Posted 25 August 2006 - 03:50 PM
Ghost + sysprep. This is very primative, and will only work for same types of HAls and chipsets. You'll have massive driver problems if you try doing a single ghosted image for every piece of hardware
There are alot of tools and guides out there for doing unattended install...
Like this one:
Unattended Installation guide including slipstreaming service packs
And try this thread:
Useful Info. for the Windows OS, Tips, tweaks, slipstreaming, etc
#3
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:21 PM
#4
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:46 PM
Illrigger, on Aug 26 2006, 21:21, said:
#5
Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:32 PM
I haven't had much of a problem with HALs to be honest..... drivers moreso than HALS
#6
Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:21 AM
I made an image of the Dell factory image in my Dell OptiPlex GX280 (i915)
I deployed that image to an OptiPlex GX270 (i865) and OptiPlex GX260 (i845) and it worked fine
so it is technically possible
#7
Posted 27 August 2006 - 12:22 PM
Quote
I was thinking of this two days ago, why they dont make an option that can replace the HAL without doing full Windows XP Repair?!.
#8
Posted 27 August 2006 - 12:57 PM
Foxconn, on Aug 26 2006, 22:21, said:
I made an image of the Dell factory image in my Dell OptiPlex GX280 (i915)
I deployed that image to an OptiPlex GX270 (i865) and OptiPlex GX260 (i845) and it worked fine
so it is technically possible
Yea, but you're talking about 2 VERY similiar machines. Your image wouldn't work on an HP desktop and a IBM laptop. (Although I made one that does
XP_2600, on Aug 27 2006, 07:22, said:
Quote
I was thinking of this two days ago, why they dont make an option that can replace the HAL without doing full Windows XP Repair?!.
Again, I ask, how often is the HAL touched. I've made a couple different images on all different types of machines, and they've all had the same basic HAL.
#9
Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:39 PM
#10
Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:19 PM
Instead, it's been switched to its own project, on its own timeline, and supporting both XP, Vista, and presumably 2K3.
#11
Posted 28 August 2006 - 11:22 PM
Taco Bell, on Aug 28 2006, 13:19, said:
Instead, it's been switched to its own project, on its own timeline, and supporting both XP, Vista, and presumably 2K3.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users












