The TRUTH about Hillary Clinton
Started by Chugworth, Nov 20 2007 02:11 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 November 2007 - 02:11 AM
We couldn't get the Swift Boat Veterans for this campaign, so we had to resort to other means. You CERTAINLY wouldn't vote for Hillary after watching this commercial!
#2
Posted 20 November 2007 - 02:37 AM
LOL
Well, I wouldn't ever vote for her on principal. She's a terrible senator for a terrible state government. (mine)
Well, I wouldn't ever vote for her on principal. She's a terrible senator for a terrible state government. (mine)
Edited by Sinbad, 20 November 2007 - 02:38 AM.
#3
Posted 20 November 2007 - 07:17 PM
What the hell is that about? Was this just a random video by some company or was this purposely made for some purpose (other than to slate her).
#4
Posted 26 November 2007 - 10:49 PM
Oh dear! Now it seems that Hillary is a lesbian! 
This ought to go over well with the southern and religious voters.

DON'T GO THERE: BRIT PAPER STARTS 'UGLIEST MONTH'
Sun Nov 25 2007 20:45:12 ET
The TIMES of London starts 'The Ugliest Month' with a full page photo takeout on Hillary Clinton and her beautiful personal assistant.
"Hillary Clinton has been accused of having an affair with Huma Abedin," reads the caption.
MORE
The splash stunned British readers and angered campaign insiders.
"This does not even qualify as tabloid trash... it's ridiculous and reckless," a Hillary confidante explained over the weekend.
Taking the whisper from the underground to the overground, the paper made no claims to knowing any truth of the relationship between Hillary and Huma, in its story headlined: "Snarls, smears and innuendo as attack dogs get ready for the fray."
The current campaign promises to become one of the dirtiest in modern history.
Developing...
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashhh.htm
This ought to go over well with the southern and religious voters.
QUOTE

DON'T GO THERE: BRIT PAPER STARTS 'UGLIEST MONTH'
Sun Nov 25 2007 20:45:12 ET
The TIMES of London starts 'The Ugliest Month' with a full page photo takeout on Hillary Clinton and her beautiful personal assistant.
"Hillary Clinton has been accused of having an affair with Huma Abedin," reads the caption.
MORE
The splash stunned British readers and angered campaign insiders.
"This does not even qualify as tabloid trash... it's ridiculous and reckless," a Hillary confidante explained over the weekend.
Taking the whisper from the underground to the overground, the paper made no claims to knowing any truth of the relationship between Hillary and Huma, in its story headlined: "Snarls, smears and innuendo as attack dogs get ready for the fray."
The current campaign promises to become one of the dirtiest in modern history.
Developing...
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashhh.htm
#5
Posted 27 November 2007 - 12:30 AM
I've never followed American politics until this last year or so. it's just too amusing not to follow
#6
Posted 30 November 2007 - 11:46 PM
LOL
#7
Posted 07 December 2007 - 03:39 AM
LOL
ROFLMAO
SHES NOT A WOMAN, SHES A MAN!
no wonder Bill did what he did all those years ago.
ROFLMAO
SHES NOT A WOMAN, SHES A MAN!
no wonder Bill did what he did all those years ago.
#8
Posted 07 December 2007 - 03:51 AM
Hillary... a lesbian?
y
y
y
y
y
e
e
e
e
a
a
a
a
h
h
h
h
i dont care if she's an ugly old hag, if she was a lesbian you KNOW there'd be make-out shots hot off the presses... our president plays with tittyballs.
nevermind
right now i really like dennis kucinich , but ill go with whomever the DNC selects because whoever that will be will closer represent my beliefs by far than any other candidate with election potential.
i dont care if she's an ugly old hag, if she was a lesbian you KNOW there'd be make-out shots hot off the presses... our president plays with tittyballs.
nevermind
right now i really like dennis kucinich , but ill go with whomever the DNC selects because whoever that will be will closer represent my beliefs by far than any other candidate with election potential.
#9
Posted 07 December 2007 - 04:03 AM
I'm still just watching the debates on both sides, left and right, and later or sooner I'll make my decision on who I'm going to vote for. Right now its too early for me to make a decision, because I keep getting confused by this fucking monkey with gray hair that stands behind a piece of wood with an eagle on it.
#10
Posted 07 December 2007 - 06:31 PM
Its unfortunate but who you're going to vote for - if its a candidate who stands one shot in a million of being actually elected - will either be an officially endorsed republican or democrat.
I think independent. libertarian, green, may succeed at the state level and below, but not for president.
And non dnc/gop endorsed democrat and republican candidates just achieve stolen votes.
I think independent. libertarian, green, may succeed at the state level and below, but not for president.
And non dnc/gop endorsed democrat and republican candidates just achieve stolen votes.
#11
Posted 07 December 2007 - 07:51 PM
QUOTE (adamj @ Dec 7 2007, 17:31) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Its unfortunate but who you're going to vote for - if its a candidate who stands one shot in a million of being actually elected - will either be an officially endorsed republican or democrat.
I think independent. libertarian, green, may succeed at the state level and below, but not for president.
And non dnc/gop endorsed democrat and republican candidates just achieve stolen votes.
I think independent. libertarian, green, may succeed at the state level and below, but not for president.
And non dnc/gop endorsed democrat and republican candidates just achieve stolen votes.
Well there is a problem for voting Green, independent, or libertarian. The problem is that whenever you vote for them (who will never EVER win for president) those votes are pretty much put on the person who is winning the election. Thats the reason why so many people were fucking begging Nader not to run, because that stupid prick only helped Bush lol.
Anyways, I want my vote to be where it matters. Not be like some people that say something retarded like:
"Well I don't like this republican person and I really don't feel like voting for the Democrat because they seem to be sneaky, so I'm just gonna vote for independent cause like they want to make pot legal and like I think they will win, so who fucking cares."
---Someone actually said that to me in 2004 quote/end quote from what I remember. That fucking idiot. He actually believed that Nader was going to win and that pot would be made legal, but the idiot didn't know much about politics and something called The Congress that would prevent the President to ever legalize marijuana, unless Snoop Dog and every other Rap Star were running The Congress lol.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












