Originally from : http://www.macshrine.com/2006/02/23/first-...od-video-shots/
Mirror of pic with comments on : http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/23/is-this...blet/2#comments
Well, it looks very interesting, and certainly matches the patent applications apple had; the back setting is similar to the 5G leak too. As has been said on engadget, there's no object to help us scale the images size, but is that plug is a dock connector, it's just slightly bigger than the current ipod.
What do you think?
Edit: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser...ple+computer%22
- Apple's Patent in touch screen technology
Full Version: The new ipod?
oooh interesting
that looks too easy to break
pah, i just bought a 5g ipod as well.
ahh well.
ahh well.
The picture is a fake and click here for a video on how it was created.
lol oh well
lol omghax!!!111
I can't view it; what version of Quicktime is required?
@ahanix1989: I was able to view it with QuickTime 7.
lol thats good
Ohh man i believed it. Anyway, the video is in dutch language. Nice to know i was tricked by a fellow dutchman.
one of my teachers was telling me about that... i think the article is somewhere around thinksecret.com
if i find it ill post it here
Edit:
5th Gen Video iPod
This video iPod, which has been in development and on the table since before Apple released the 5G iPod last year with video playback, will feature a display that will occupy the entire front face of the device. Sources who have seen the device report that it features a digital click wheel, one that overlays the touch-sensitive display and appears when a finger touches it and disappears when the finger is removed.
Source : Thinksecret.com
if i find it ill post it here
Edit:
5th Gen Video iPod
This video iPod, which has been in development and on the table since before Apple released the 5G iPod last year with video playback, will feature a display that will occupy the entire front face of the device. Sources who have seen the device report that it features a digital click wheel, one that overlays the touch-sensitive display and appears when a finger touches it and disappears when the finger is removed.
Source : Thinksecret.com
Haha, I wasn't sure when I first saw it. I've been faked out too many times, but the look is interesting. I'll believe a pic only when I see the ads from Apple, not before.
these do look good, fake or not
These ones are causing a stir too now; check digg for bigger versions.
they look pretty hard to fake. i quite like the UI. although the music playback screen looks *really* odd.
Fake or real?Update:
Check http://mirror.root.vc/macshrine.com/ipodav.htm for extreme high res pictures.
This has to be real.
Update2:
Mirrors:
http://flickr.com/photos/tauquil/sets/72057594075602860/
http://sixpop.com/images/images/7534598.jpg
http://sixpop.com/images/images/35362040.jpg
http://sixpop.com/images/images/84906778.jpg
http://www.itspj.com/ipod//1full.jpg
http://www.itspj.com/ipod//2full.jpg
http://www.itspj.com/ipod//3full.jpg
that'd be sweet, that video of someone faking it did seem kinda fishy. I mean fool us but why make an in depth video about how you did it?
http://www.itspj.com/ipod//1full.jpg
Why is it, despite one part being on the dock and the rest off, the shadow height doesn't change? you'd think the shadow would be a little different as it runs along because part of it is higher up
http://www.ahanix.org/100_1127.JPG
Kinda blurry, but notice how the shadow gets smaller as it reaches the corner
--
http://mirror.root.vc/macshrine.com/3full.jpg
I don't see any pixels on the screen, seems too high resolution -- you'd think you'd see some small space or at least a little noise in the gradients... and despite the device being at a percieved angle, the image really isn't. The screenimage appears to be looking directly at you, just resized towards the bottom. Show rulers in Photoshop, and drag them to create guides. You'll notice while the top of the screenimage goes at an angle like the device itself, the bottom is completely flat and straight
See, note how the top runs at an angle, but the bottom doesn't. Kinda strange
--
Of course, I can be wrong. I'm just saying, it's very possible it's fake
Why is it, despite one part being on the dock and the rest off, the shadow height doesn't change? you'd think the shadow would be a little different as it runs along because part of it is higher up
http://www.ahanix.org/100_1127.JPG
Kinda blurry, but notice how the shadow gets smaller as it reaches the corner
--
http://mirror.root.vc/macshrine.com/3full.jpg
I don't see any pixels on the screen, seems too high resolution -- you'd think you'd see some small space or at least a little noise in the gradients... and despite the device being at a percieved angle, the image really isn't. The screenimage appears to be looking directly at you, just resized towards the bottom. Show rulers in Photoshop, and drag them to create guides. You'll notice while the top of the screenimage goes at an angle like the device itself, the bottom is completely flat and straight
See, note how the top runs at an angle, but the bottom doesn't. Kinda strange
--
Of course, I can be wrong. I'm just saying, it's very possible it's fake
Could be distortion from the camera lens. Not sure though.
And it's again a fake!
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=2218118&posted=1
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=2218118&posted=1
awwwwwwww.
it's been fun.
it's been fun.
QUOTE(ahanix1989 @ Mar 5 2006, 19:58) 
http://www.itspj.com/ipod//1full.jpg
Why is it, despite one part being on the dock and the rest off, the shadow height doesn't change? you'd think the shadow would be a little different as it runs along because part of it is higher up
http://www.ahanix.org/100_1127.JPG
Kinda blurry, but notice how the shadow gets smaller as it reaches the corner
--
http://mirror.root.vc/macshrine.com/3full.jpg
I don't see any pixels on the screen, seems too high resolution -- you'd think you'd see some small space or at least a little noise in the gradients... and despite the device being at a percieved angle, the image really isn't. The screenimage appears to be looking directly at you, just resized towards the bottom. Show rulers in Photoshop, and drag them to create guides. You'll notice while the top of the screenimage goes at an angle like the device itself, the bottom is completely flat and straight
See, note how the top runs at an angle, but the bottom doesn't. Kinda strange
--
Of course, I can be wrong. I'm just saying, it's very possible it's fake
QUOTE
What you got right / stupid mistakes we made:
1 - Typoed the remaining time on the eminem track. Was supposed to read 1:09.
2 - Ice Age 2 duration didn't match up with the trailer, as it was supposed to.
3 - No EXIF tags. When editing was complete, layers were combined, copied and pasted directly into preview and saved as a jpeg from there, leaving the image with an empty history.
4 - Need to make my brother get a manicure.
What you got wrong:
1 - The perspective of the iPod hardware is not wrong. That part isn't modified. It's a photo of a real 5G iPod.
2 - The compression artifacts do not give away the editing. All of the source images were uncompressed. Compression only occurred after final editing.
3 - So called brush marks that appeared when the image's contrast was raised were reflections placed over the iPod / Hi-Fi intentionally.
4 - The "line through the screen" in the second picture was not the crease where two ipod screens were edited together. It was the reflection of where the ceiling meets the wall.
5 - The tone of the text / logo on the back of the iPod were intentionally different, as proven here in an unedited picture:
http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...0&pagenumber=2
6 - No headphone jack in the first picture? Thats because of the perspective.
Etc.
1 - Typoed the remaining time on the eminem track. Was supposed to read 1:09.
2 - Ice Age 2 duration didn't match up with the trailer, as it was supposed to.
3 - No EXIF tags. When editing was complete, layers were combined, copied and pasted directly into preview and saved as a jpeg from there, leaving the image with an empty history.
4 - Need to make my brother get a manicure.
What you got wrong:
1 - The perspective of the iPod hardware is not wrong. That part isn't modified. It's a photo of a real 5G iPod.
2 - The compression artifacts do not give away the editing. All of the source images were uncompressed. Compression only occurred after final editing.
3 - So called brush marks that appeared when the image's contrast was raised were reflections placed over the iPod / Hi-Fi intentionally.
4 - The "line through the screen" in the second picture was not the crease where two ipod screens were edited together. It was the reflection of where the ceiling meets the wall.
5 - The tone of the text / logo on the back of the iPod were intentionally different, as proven here in an unedited picture:
http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...0&pagenumber=2
6 - No headphone jack in the first picture? Thats because of the perspective.
Etc.
what fod said, "awwwww"
Could it be....? Nano Video?
christ on a stick, DJP, don't make me move this to fun stuff!
QUOTE(Fod @ Mar 13 2006, 00:24)
christ on a stick, DJP, don't make me move this to fun stuff!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.